The Space Launch System rocket that will carry four astronauts on the Artemis II mission—the program’s first crewed test flight, scheduled for April 1—is undergoing final inspections by technicians at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Every seat in the Orion crew capsule perched atop that rocket was constructed by Lockheed Martin. The company has been producing spacecraft for NASA long before the majority of its current engineers were born, and this specific event—the first human flight around the Moon since Apollo 17 in 1972—represents the kind of milestone that usually draws investors’ attention. In Q4 2025 alone, Lockheed Martin’s Space division generated $3.16 billion in revenue, an 8% increase over the previous year. Every successful Artemis milestone has the potential to, and usually does, result in further contract activity. The backlog that underpins it all? by the end of 2025, a record $194 billion.
Nevertheless, LMT’s stock fell 2.80% on Monday, ending the day at $598.57. The stock dropped an additional 3.30% the week prior. Shares have dropped nearly 14% from their 52-week high of $692 earlier in the year, settling into a range that has analysts arguing over whether the correction is a buying opportunity or the start of something more complex. With a market capitalization of just under $138 billion and a P/E ratio of 27.86, this company is still trading at much higher levels than it was a year ago. It has increased by 24% year-to-date and 39% over the last twelve months, easily outpacing the modest gains of the S&P 500 and well ahead of an index that has actually lost 7% since January. However, there is more to the recent pressure than just general market anxiety.
| Key Information | Details |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Stock Ticker | LMT (NYSE) |
| Founded | March 15, 1995 (merger of Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta) |
| CEO | James Taiclet (since June 15, 2020) |
| Headquarters | Bethesda, Maryland / Fort Worth, Texas |
| Employees | ~123,000 (2025) |
| Current Share Price (Mar 30, 2026) | $598.57 |
| 52-Week Range | $410.11 – $692.00 |
| Market Cap | ~$137.95 billion |
| P/E Ratio | 27.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% / Quarterly Dividend: $3.46/share |
| YTD Performance (2026) | +24.41% (vs. S&P 500 -7.33%) |
| 1-Year Return | +39.28% |
| Q4 2025 Revenue | $20.32 billion (+9.1% YoY) |
| FY2025 Annual Revenue | $75.05 billion |
| Record Backlog (End 2025) | $194 billion |
| Key Programs | F-35, Orion crew capsule (Artemis), Precision Strike Missile, Space segment |
| Analyst Consensus | Hold — Average price target $623.16–$664.80 |
| Key Risk Factors | F-35 radar supplier delays; GPS OCX cancellation risk; European defense independence push |
| Reference Website | Lockheed Martin Investor Relations |
A large portion of the late-March weakness can be explained by two events that occurred in the same week. In order to lessen Europe’s dependency on non-EU defense contractors, the European Commission first approved a 1.5 billion euro work program under the European Defence Industry Programme. One of the biggest defense-spending blocs in the world has made that a stated policy goal, and Lockheed Martin’s export business, which accounts for a sizable portion of its earnings from F-35 sales and missile systems to allied governments, is squarely in the path of this change. For precisely this reason, Melius Research downgraded LMT. Second, Lockheed Martin was anticipated to compete for the Next Generation Air Dominance contract, which was awarded to Boeing by the U.S. Air Force. After that announcement, a Bank of America analyst noted the competitive loss and downgraded the stock. When analysts who had been generally supportive make two downward revisions in the same week, institutional holders who want to book gains after a strong run tend to sell more quickly.
Observing LMT’s price action through March gives the impression that the stock ran quickly on the Iran war premium—defense spending optimism, demand for missile systems, and general flight-to-safety in an industry that actually benefits from geopolitical instability—and is currently absorbing that premium against some background company-specific friction. Due to supplier problems, Lockheed’s most significant single contract, the F-35 program, is delivering aircraft without the AN/APG-85 radar system, restricting them to training purposes rather than full combat readiness. It’s not a crisis. However, it is a visible program execution issue on the company’s most visible program, and it raises questions about future revenue timing and delivery schedules. The Pentagon is reportedly considering canceling the GPS OCX ground control system, another contract that Lockheed is exposed to, due to ongoing delays and software flaws.
Despite this, Q4 2025 revenue of $20.32 billion exceeded forecasts, up 9.1% year over year, despite earnings per share of $5.80 falling short of the $6.33 consensus by a significant $0.53. With an annual revenue of $75.05 billion, Lockheed Martin is the third-largest company in the industrial goods sector. $5.02 billion was the net profit. For the current fiscal year, analysts predict earnings per share of $27.15. With a payout ratio of 64.22% and an annualized dividend of $13.80 (a 2.31% yield at current prices), Lockheed has a disciplined history of sustaining and increasing that dividend over defense budget cycles. The stock hardly correlates with larger market swings, as evidenced by its beta of 0.20, which is among the lowest in the S&P 500. That quality has a certain value in challenging market conditions.
Royal Bank of Canada is at $650, while Morgan Stanley is aiming for $675 on LMT. With seven Buys, thirteen Holds, and one Sell, the average among analysts monitored by MarketBeat is $623.16. Similar results are displayed by TipRanks, which indicates a consensus hold with an average target of $674.08, suggesting an increase of about 12.6% from the close on March 30. Before the company’s April 21 earnings report, which will give investors a first look at how Q1 2026 performance is shaping up against a backdrop of high oil prices, debates over defense spending, and the ongoing question of how aggressively Europe will actually follow through on its push for self-sufficiency, it is still unclear whether that upside materializes. As of right now, LMT appears to be a business in the midst of a narrative rather than a clearly concluded chapter.

